THE NEW MORAL MAJORITY AND THE MORAL IMPERATIVE

What is a moral imperative and what does it cost? Well that depends upon which moral imperative you are referring to. According to the Liberal Democrats just about everything in their agenda is a moral imperative.  It's a phrase Nancy Pelosi has tattooed to the front lobe of her brain, (I know, many of you thought she didn't have a brain) and honestly you do have to wonder about how she turned a forum on Global Warming into a jobs summit. Leave it to Nancy to go global with her stupidity.

It seems like every time they use the term moral imperative it precedes one of their proposals that will end up costing the American Taxpayers more money. Welcome the new "Moral, (More Expensive), Majority." Bank takeovers, industry takeovers, health care, stimulus money, you name it. Now Global Warming has become a moral imperative and just how much will that cost the taxpayer?  According to Hiliary Clinton, the goal of the UN is to supply about 100 billion a year to a UN fund to assist developing nations with clean energy production, of which she said the US would possibly commit to 20%. In reality that's 20 billion a year and probably more.

We are in the midst of a terrible economic downturn, massive unemployment, a soaring deficit and basically in debt for the next billion years and these idiots are willing to turn over 20 billion dollars or more to the UN yearly? The UN is the most corrupt organization in the world. They would trust them with our taxpayer money so some dictator in the middle of nowhere can put up a couple of solar panels and then buy a yacht and stash the rest in a Swiss bank account. Afterwards he pays a percentage back to the guy in the UN who approved his request for funds. There are probably people at the UN right now planning their retirement on this colossal political blunder in the making. And who flies in for the last minute endorsement of the deal? President Barack Hussein Obama, Mr. Sell-Out himself.

All this Global Warming, moral imperative crap is about deceiving people into the radical, liberal plan of socialising America, not only at home but on a global scale. Obama's "redistribution of the wealth" now includes the rest of the world. And since none of these green mental giants can get on the same page,Nancy Pelosi has seen fit to create more confusion and head scratching by saying the conference is really about creating green jobs at home and abroad. What a farce and we the taxpayers are paying for this! Do any of these people read the latest poll numbers?  Global Warming is not a major concern at home. It's the economy and jobs stupid. America can't wait for all these fictitious green jobs to fall from the sky out of your dreams and we certainly can't afford 20 billion a year thrown into a cause that uses flawed science to spread alarm which always proves to be wrong. Just look at Al Gore telling everyone in Copenhagen that the Arctic ice will be gone in 5 years, and yes Al, I don't believe the Polar Bears are endangered and yes, they are increasing in numbers whether you like it or not! And while we're at it, why would you believe in saving Polar Bears and not the life of unborn humans?

It's not even worth trying to point out the hypocrisy in this whole debate because the Democrats have taken the self righteous, moral high ground. Nancy Pelosi barred all Republicans from the news conference in Copenhagen the other day because they had dissenting views. Unless you're a good Obama Socialist you're not welcome. After the news conference they showed brief video clips of her and her "toady" Hoyer wandering around like tourists on vacation, no doubt spreading the moral imperative message about creating green jobs.

The only solution to all this lunacy is to keep exposing them at every turn and then every American needs to make it their own personal "moral imperative" to vote them out of office.

Edisto Joe

Related articles by Zemanta

• From dinner to desperation: The 24-hour race for a deal in Copenhagen (guardian.co.uk)